Ayodhya verdict: Disputed land for temple, separate one for mosque

A suitable plot of land measuring 5 acres to be given to Sunni Board for building mosque: CJI

Hindus to get land subject to conditions, says CJI. Centre to frame a scheme, trust to be formed.

Unanimous verdict: Muslim parties to be given alternate land, rules Supreme Court.

Cannot differentiate between one religion and another, says Supreme Court

Both suit 4 of Sunni Board and suit 5 of Ram Lalla have to be decreed and relief should moulded

It is clearly established that while Muslims offered prayer inside the inner courtyard while the same was done by Hindus in the outer court yard: SC

The Muslims have not brought evidence to show possessory title, there is no evidence to show the offer of Namaz by Muslims to the exclusion of Hindus

Updates on Ayodhya verdict:

– The outer courtyard became a focal point of worshipping by Hindus

– Riots of 1934 indicate that the possession of inner courtyard became a matter of serious contention

– Muslims have not been able to establish possessory title to inner courtyard, Supreme Court.