A suitable plot of land measuring 5 acres to be given to Sunni Board for building mosque: CJI
Hindus to get land subject to conditions, says CJI. Centre to frame a scheme, trust to be formed.
Unanimous verdict: Muslim parties to be given alternate land, rules Supreme Court.
Cannot differentiate between one religion and another, says Supreme Court
Both suit 4 of Sunni Board and suit 5 of Ram Lalla have to be decreed and relief should moulded
It is clearly established that while Muslims offered prayer inside the inner courtyard while the same was done by Hindus in the outer court yard: SC
The Muslims have not brought evidence to show possessory title, there is no evidence to show the offer of Namaz by Muslims to the exclusion of Hindus
Updates on Ayodhya verdict:
– The outer courtyard became a focal point of worshipping by Hindus
– Riots of 1934 indicate that the possession of inner courtyard became a matter of serious contention
– Muslims have not been able to establish possessory title to inner courtyard, Supreme Court.
From documentary evidence it emerges that prior to 1857, there was no exclusion of Hindus from worshiping at the site, Supreme Court
SC: Title should be decided based on evidence in a court of law. Title cannot be established based on faith and belief
Delhi police appeals for “peace and tranquility”
In view of the upcoming judgment by Hon’ble Supreme Court regarding Ayodhya matter, Delhi Police requests every citizen to contribute to peace and tranquility.
— Delhi Police (@DelhiPolice) November 9, 2019
Accounts of travellers must be read with introspection. Court must be circumspect in taking conclusions from what a traveller may have seen and observed, says apex court
Ayodhya verdict: Supreme Court says that faith and belief of Hindus that Ram was born in Ayodhya is justified
Ahead of the Ayodhya verdict, South India on high alert
There is adequate material in ASI report to conclude the following: Babri Masjid not constructed on vacant land. There was a structure underlying the disputed structure. The underlying structure was not an Islamic structure, Supreme Court.
Ram Janam Bhoomi not a juristic person, holds Supreme Court
The claim of Nirmohi Akhara is only of management. Nirmohi Akhara is not a Shabait, rules Supreme Court
The claim of Nirmohi Akhara is only of management. Nirmohi Akhara is not a Shabait, rules Supreme Court
— Bar & Bench (@barandbench) November 9, 2019
Secularism basic feature of the Constitution: SC
Court should preserve balance: Supreme Court
“Court should preserve balance”, Supreme Court.
“Mosque built by Mir Baqi on order of Babur”.
“Idols were placed in the mosque in 1949”, Supreme Court
— Bar & Bench (@barandbench) November 9, 2019
CJI Ranjan Gogoi begins reading the verditc
The verdict on Ayodhya case is to be an unanimous judgment
The Ayodhya Judgment will be an unanimous judgment. Pronouncement of judgment to last for half an hour#AYODHYAVERDICT #AyodhyaHearing
— Bar & Bench (@barandbench) November 9, 2019