Tripura HC dismisses one of '10,323' teachers' plea, fines petitioner
File image

Agartala: The High Court of Tripura full bench led by Chief Justice Aparesh Kumar Singh in its first ever live hearing on Tuesday dismissed a petition of one of the retrenched 10,323 teachers who questioned the process of termination.

The petitioner argued that he was not a party in the petition in which the High Court scrapped the recruitment rules based on which the appointments were made.

Speaking on the issue, Advocate General SS Dey said, “One of the 10,323 teachers moved the High Court questioning the process of termination. In his plea, the petitioner tried to say that he had been terminated from services despite not being a party in the case in which the recruitments rules had been challenged. From our point, the government said that none of them had been terminated from the services. In fact, the state government moved the Supreme Court seeking relief for them much after the apex court had already upheld the judgment of the High Court”.

The fact remains, he explained, that the state government extended their period of service till March 2020 on ad-hoc basis. “The termination which is in question is not done by the department under the state government. Their jobs cease to exist because of a judicial order. The state government issued memorandum in accordance with the judgment and informed the teachers that the Court has given a deadline that after March 2020, the government would not be able to keep all of you in service. Hence all of you are terminated”, Dey told EastMojo.

He added that since the government is not directly terminating the teachers from services, no question of serving notices arise.

Dear Reader,
Over the past four years, EastMojo revolutionised the coverage of Northeast India through our sharp, impactful, and unbiased coverage. And we are not saying this: you, our readers, say so about us. Thanks to you, we have become Northeast India’s largest, independent, multimedia digital news platform.
Now, we need your help to sustain what you started.
We are fiercely protective of our ‘independent’ status and would like to remain so: it helps us provide quality journalism free from biases and agendas. From travelling to the remotest regions to cover various issues to paying local reporters honest wages to encourage them, we spend our money on where it matters.
Now, we seek your support in remaining truly independent, unbiased, and objective. We want to show the world that it is possible to cover issues that matter to the people without asking for corporate and/or government support. We can do it without them; we cannot do it without you.
Support independent journalism, subscribe to EastMojo.

Thank you,
Karma Paljor

According to the advocate general, the High Court has categorically used the term “despicable” for the repeated attempts made by the 10,323 teachers to file fresh petitions in connection with same matter. “The Court has said that the petitioner had nothing new to say before the Court. The petitioner also fails to explain as to why he should still be in service in spite of the fact that the whole recruitment policy of the previous government was described as unconstitutional in the successive judgments of the High Court and the Supreme Court”, Dey said.

The Court imposed a cost of Rs 25,000 on the petitioner for wastage of judicial time, Dey informed.    

Also Read | Mass rejig in Tripura state bodies, new faces assume crucial posts

Trending Stories

Latest Stories

Leave a comment

Leave a comment