Mumbai court dismisses cop’s defamation plea against Arnab

Mumbai: A sessions court here has dismissed a criminal defamation complaint filed by a Mumbai police officer against Republic TV editor-in-chief Arnab Goswami over certain claims made during the coverage of the Sushant Singh Rajput death case.

The plea, by Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP) Abhishek Trimukhe, was dismissed by the court on April 1, but a detailed order was made available on Thursday.

Trimukhe’s complaint had also named ARG Outlier Media Pvt Ltd, which owns Republic Media Network, and Goswami’s wife, who is a director in the company. The complainant had alleged thatthere were some tweets by Goswami and others which misrepresented him.

Additional sessions judge Uday Padwad found that Trimukhe’s complaint was not in conformity with the mandatory requirement ofsection199(2)of the CrPC for the court to take cognizance.

As per provisions of 199(2) of the CrPC, any offence falling under Chapter XXI of the Indian Penal Code (45 of 1860) is alleged to have been committed against a public servant in connection with the discharge of his public functions, a court of session may take cognizance of such offence upon a written complaint by a public prosecutor.

Upon perusal of the complaintsubmissions made before the court, the judge noted the complaint in this case was filed by the DCP himself and not through a public prosecutor.

Also read: From Pulwama to Kangana, 5 most damning statements of Arnab Goswami leaked on WhatsApp

The judge, however, said the complainant can take his grievances to a magistrate court.

“It is notthat the aggrieved public servant against whomthesaid offenceisallegedtohavebeencommitted has no forum totake hisgrievancesto. Hehastheremedytomake a complaint before the competent magistrate,” the court said.

“His filing of the complaint even through the public prosecutor, however, would not confer any jurisdiction on this court to take cognizance of the alleged offence,” it added.

The DCP had filed the complaint in February under Indian Penal Code sections 499, 500 (defamation) and 501 (printing or engraving matter known to be defamatory).

Goswami made “grossly false”, “malicious” and “defamatory” statements during the coverage of actor Rajput’s death in June last year, the police officer had claimed.

The 34-year-old Bollywood actor was found dead in his apartment in suburban Bandra.

These defamatory statements were telecast on the channel, Republic Bharat, during a discussion about phone records of actor Rhea Chakraborty, Rajput’s girlfriend, the complaint said.

“The said defamatory attacks have been made with a singular view of assassinating his (Trimukhe’s) official character and thereby…maliciously and deliberately causing undue humiliation of the Mumbai Police Department,” the complainthad said.

Goswami also tweeted the contents of the telecast to a larger audience, the complaint said.

Also read: Arnab Goswami’s arrest: What is the case all about?